By a strange coincidence, GM canola is also a product of Monsanto.
A review of the literature in 2000 concluded that "under present and expected conditions of new use, there is no potential for Roundup herbicide to pose a health risk to humans".[4] This review considered the likely effects experienced by the two groups most likely to have high exposures, herbicide applicators and children aged 1-6, noting the exposure in those subpopulations was not a health concern.[4] Glyphosate has an EPA Toxicity Class of III in 1993,[5] but more recent studies suggest that IV is appropriate for oral, dermal, and inhalation exposure.[4] It has been rated as class I (Severe) for eye irritation, however.[4]
Outside its intended use, glyphosate can be lethal. For example, with intentional poisonings there is approximately a 10% mortality for those ingesting glyphosate, compared to 70% for those ingesting paraquat.[6]
Laboratory toxicology studies suggest that other ingredients combined with glyphosate may have greater toxicity than glyphosate alone. For example, a study comparing glyphosate and Roundup found that Roundup had a greater effect on aromatase than glyphosate alone.[7]
So, you may consume GM canola without knowing it. That is the point.If it is safe then why not shout it out from the roofs?
If people want to consume a product that has aborbed glyphosphate then let them know what they are consuming. Let the consumer make the choice.
Footnote:
I've just read what an apologist for GM canola is saying. That GM canola requires less Roundup than ordinary canola crops.
No comments:
Post a Comment