Tuesday, March 20, 2007

The Meaning of Beauty

There are times when I lose myself in deep thoughts, and recently a comment on one of the blogs got me thinking about one of these subjects.
Beauty, we all know it's about physical symmetry and absence of flaws that defines beauty. There are many different types of beauty and the stereotype of the big breasted blond is merely cliche.
I am talking about beauty as it applies to women of course.
I won't get bogged down in definitions of what constitutes beauty because that is not really what I want to contemplate.

My fascination is with the purpose of beauty if it has any purpose at all.

Before anyone jumps in and tells me it's about procreation or natural selection or some other scientific bent, just stop and think for a moment about the animal kingdom. Amongst the animal species where beauty serves any purpose, it is the male of the species that carries the plumage, the color or the magnificent display to attract the female.
In the animal kingdom, the female chooses the most attractive male and beauty does serve a particular function.

Within human beings, the roles are reversed and beauty is possessed by the female of the species to attract the male. Now here is a limited purpose to this in that the female chooses the male who will impregnate her. There is a vague resemblance to the natural selection process occurring here but wait, hasn't human society been patriarchal rather than matriarchal?
In other words, it is the males who are in control. It has always been that the man, as the provider has the right to choose his female partner.
In this regard, we might begin to understand female beauty as being a byproduct of natural selection by the male of the species to reproduce with the most attractive woman they can get.
But, and this is a bit but, if this was indeed the case, then by now we would have selectively filtered out all ugly people within the human race. We know that this isn't the case.

So, a beautiful women is something to desire, to want to possess but in the end it doesn't matter.
So what is the purpose?
Is beauty just another anomaly like the human appendix, for example, it's there but doesn't have any real purpose?

Or did beauty evolve for the specific purpose of advertising? Maybe God could see into the future and thought there would eventually be a need for beautiful women to help advertisers sell merchandise by standing in a bikini next to a brand new automobile and contorting their bodies in some sort of simulated orgasm?

Or maybe beautiful women are there to reward those lucky enough to become fabulously wealthy and have the need to demonstrate their affluence by having a trophy wife clinging to their arm?

Where would the porn industry be without beautiful women?

What would Hollywood market without the endless supply of photogenic faces to fill it's movies with?

Is it in fact that we have been lucky enough to live in a time when photography and beauty have come together to celebrate the pointlessness of beauty. Beauty as an end in itself?
Beauty as something to covet, to desire but as empty and as unfulfillable as a Chinese meal?

9 comments:

Michael said...

Fascinating post, lex, but here is a question:
Did you consider that men might be beautiful in the eyes of women?

And that mutual perceptions of beauty could easily be an unconscious adaptation to make the reproductive act easier?

After all, even in societies that are heavily patriarchal or heavily matriarchal, both parties' consent is usually required before sex (not always, but usually).

none said...

A recent scientific study tested peoples reactions to photographs (both men and women) and were asked to rate their attractivness on a 1-10 scale.

It turns out both sexes picked beauty as the faces having the most even symetry. They think this may be a genetic cue as the ones that are the most symetrical are thought to have the best DNA.

Women look at symetry too but when looking for someone to mate with they look at jaw line, and mesomorphic body shape. These women don't necessarily marry these
men but they are likely to mate with them if given an opprotunity.

Kirsten N. Namskau said...

I think, when it come to human, it is equal. But the men have consentrated on their wish and needs.
Women also goes for individual preferences when it comes to choosing a man.
Men shall not have the feminin beauty, but be masculine handsome look.

Beauty / masculinity is depending on the eye looking.

Timmy said...

Interesting point(s)...
It's also interesting to consider the role of homosexuality in this same context. Like heterosexual relationships, you have dominant (trad. male) and submissive (trad. female) roles, but you also have the oddity of a male attempting to take on feminine physical characteristics (despite the fact that neither partner is supposedly attracted to the opposite sex) in order to fulfill some type of sexual (?) role in the relationship.
It doesn't exactly make sense to me, but it would be interesting to hear how this fits into your theory...

Anonymous said...

Too deep for me... I have always said, that while I am the head of the family Raffaella is the neck.

Jeannie said...

Obviously, although men will choose the most beautiful woman they can get as a rule, women will often opt for a successful rather than handsome man. Since a man does not need to be handsome to be successful, we still have ugly people.
And I wouldn't say that men don't have plumage to rely on - the plumage in question may be the expensive car, exclusive address, designer suit, rolex watch etc which attracts the females.

Lexcen said...

Michael, physical attraction usually happens whether people are beautiful or not.

Hammer, yes symmetry defines beauty but does beauty serve any real purpose? The human species continues to increase exponentially regardless of whether the proportion of beautiful people increases exponentially or not.

David, I'm never too deep.

Timmy, I will have to plead ignorance in matters regarding homosexuals.

Kirsten, yes men can also have the traits of physical beauty. I don't see beautiful men and beautiful women attracted to each other. I see quite the opposite.

Jeannie, I think you make an excellent point that today the modern male's plumage is his bank balance.

Michael said...

lex:
I agree, physical attraction happens, and physical beauty has little to do with it.
However, have you ever been attracted to someone you did not find beautifu?

There are as many definitions of beauty as there are people on Earth, and I don't think that ugly people are getting laid.

Lexcen said...

Michael, you've hit the nail on the head. My greatest perplexity is the fact that I see everyday so many ugly women who are pushing prams with young children. Usually they are proportioned like elephants which I would consider ugly. Others are just plain ugly. Working with the public gives me an up to date view on what is happening. I tell you, never in my life have I seen so many ugly women with young babies. Somebody must be mounting these women and it has nothing to do with physical beauty. Of course I also see a large number of attractive women during the course of my day and rarely if ever do they have young children. Can there be a correlation here? Stay tuned for further analysis.

Labels