Monday, May 11, 2009

Australians are happy

A typical inhaler, of Serevent (salmeterol), a...Image via Wikipedia

A survey by the Australian Bureau of Statistics shows that most Australians are happy.

The survey also revealed ...
The fact that 40% take happy pills is interesting because I'm part of that 40%.
I'm also part of the 52% with poor eyesight.
I'm also part of the 15% with arthritis.
I'm also part of the 15% who suffer hay fever and allergies.
I'm also part of the 14% with back problems.
I'm sure I'm part of the 11% with mental or behavioral problems.
10% suffer from asthma and that includes me.
10% suffer from deafness and I've been deaf in my left ear all my life.

In other words I'm a very typical Australian.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

6 comments:

Jeannie said...

I dunno - you're in a lot of minorities there - maybe you should demand special treatment.

Hammer said...

You hit the proverbial jackpot.

FJ said...

Only 40%? Civilization imposes a "mental disease" upon ALL of us. It's a nervous condition that causes our brains to continually to "develop" and "adapt".

Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morals, Essay #2

16

At this point, I can no longer avoid setting out, in an initial, provisional statement, my own hypothesis about the origin of “bad conscience.” It is not easy to get people to attend to it, and it requires them to consider it at length, to guard it, and to sleep on it. I consider bad conscience the profound illness which human beings had to come down with under the pressure of that most fundamental of all the changes which they ever experienced—that change when they finally found themselves locked within the confines of society and peace. Just like the things water animals must have gone though when they were forced either to become land animals or to die off, so events must have played themselves out with this half-beast so happily adapted to the wilderness, war, wandering around, adventure—suddenly all its instincts were devalued and “disengaged.” From this point on, these animals were to go on foot and “carry themselves”; whereas previously they had been supported by the water. A terrible heaviness weighed them down. In performing the simplest things they felt ungainly. In dealing with this new unknown world, they no longer had their old leaders, the ruling unconscious drives which guided them safely—these unfortunate creatures were reduced to thinking, inferring, calculating, bringing together cause and effect, reduced to their “consciousness,” their most impoverished and error-prone organ! I believe that never on earth has there been such a feeling of misery, such a leaden discomfort—while at the same time those old instincts had not all of a sudden stopped imposing their demands! Only it was difficult and seldom possible to do their bidding. For the most part, they had to find new and, as it were, underground satisfactions for themselves. All instincts which are not discharged to the outside are turned back inside—this is what I call the internalization [Verinnerlichung] of man. From this first grows in man what people later call his “soul.” The entire inner world, originally as thin as if stretched between two layers of skin, expanded and extended itself, acquired depth, width, and height, to the extent that what a person discharged out into the world was obstructed. Those frightening fortifications with which the organization of the state protected itself against the old instincts for freedom—punishments belong above all to these fortifications—brought it about that all those instincts of the wild, free, roaming man turned themselves backwards, against man himself. Enmity, cruelty, joy in pursuit, in attack, in change, in destruction—all those turned themselves against the possessors of such instincts. That is the origin of “bad conscience.” The man who, because of a lack of external enemies and opposition, was forced into an oppressive narrowness and regularity of custom impatiently tore himself apart, persecuted himself, gnawed away at himself, grew upset, and did himself damage—this animal which scraped itself raw against the bars of its cage, which people want to “tame,” this impoverished creature, consumed with longing for the wild, which had to create out of its own self an adventure, a torture chamber, an uncertain and dangerous wilderness—this fool, this yearning and puzzled prisoner, became the inventor of “bad conscience.” But with him was introduced the greatest and weirdest illness, from which humanity up to the present time has not recovered, the suffering of man from man, from himself, a consequence of the forcible separation from his animal past, a leap and, so to speak, a fall into new situations and living conditions, a declaration of war against the old instincts, on which, up to that point, his power, joy, and ability to inspire fear had been based. Let us at once add that, on the other hand, the fact that there was on earth an animal soul turned against itself, taking sides against itself, meant there was something so new, profound, unheard of, enigmatic, contradictory, and full of the future, that with it the picture of the earth was fundamentally changed. In fact, it required divine spectators to appreciate the dramatic performance which then began and whose conclusion is by no means yet in sight—a spectacle too fine, too wonderful, too paradoxical, to be allowed to play itself out senselessly and unobserved on some ridiculous star or other! Since then man has been included among the most unexpected and most thrillingly lucky rolls of the dice in the game played by Heraclitus’ “great child,” whether he’s called Zeus or chance.* For himself he arouses a certain interest, a tension, a hope, almost a certainty, as if something is announcing itself with him, something is preparing itself, as if the human being were not the goal but only a way, an episode, a bridge, a great promise . . .

FJ said...

The only "escapes" are chemical mind altering substances OR "criminal" behaviors.

So "choose your poisons" wisely.

Lexcen said...

FJ, mental disorders and psychiatry are subjects I've been contemplating for a long time. It seems a ripe subject for a blog but is an extremely vast area to cover. When I finally manage to condense my ideas into a few paragraphs I'll make a post.

FJ said...

I look forward to it. As one of civilization's discontents, I'm looking for chances to "break-out" whenever I can.

Labels